A fellow member of my congregation shared with me the following promotional Christmas video from a local church. Take a look.
A fun piece, I suppose. The production quality is certainly above reproach. They put a lot of work into it, you have to give them that. As a tool for communicating their identity as a church to the unbelieving world around them—that is, who they are and what they hold most dear—by way of the skillful grip of song, the video ponders the deepest of loves at Christmas, which we learn is, first, whether or not Santa loves the individual, and if so, will he deign to allow Rudolph to lead the rest of the reindeer to one’s house with something other than coal; and second, the individual sharing this message has braved Black Friday to fill his Chevy with things that he truly wants with the hope that the approaching Christmas-tide sleigh will be equally full.
I don’t exactly have the verbal dexterity to communicate this beautiful Gospel quite like the performer in the video, so I’ll just share the lyrics here:
“Santa, do you love me? And are you riding on a sleigh full of gifts to my chimney ’cuz I want them…”
That’s the well-crafted and easily discernible point at the center of this song of outreach to the community on behalf of a Christian church.
There was something else in the video that stirred a bit of confusion, though. For one reason or another, and for only a second or two, the video drifted into a more enigmatic arena, saying, “Pastor got loud in the sermon, talkin’ ’bout a dude who had a baby with a virgin.” For the whole two minutes and sixteen seconds of the video, it was the only of its kind, and I guess I’m wondering why it was there. It didn’t really fit. Although, as a Christian myself, I say “Whew! I’m glad they sprinkled that in there.” If they hadn’t, we might’ve missed a subtle truth that helps to portray what pastors do from pulpits—which is being loud and shouting at people, sermonizing and shoving stuff down our throats that none of us wants to hear. At least they were honest about that particular impression. And then that little piece about the non-descript dude impregnating a virgin, well, I’m not really sure what that means. Is that God? Is it Joseph? Maybe it’s just a little bit of moralism tossed in since that’s how the church would prefer that babies come along in this world. Personally, my guess is that the performer just needed to fill some space and the line fit the rhyme scheme.
…Eh-hem… Let me clear the sarcasm from my throat and shifts gears a little.
Did you watch the Bush funeral? I did. Did you see that President Trump didn’t recite the Apostles’ Creed? Did you hear or see anything in the news or on social media about it? I sure did. “Deeds not creeds,” I’ve seen heralded from Christian sources. “The church doesn’t need creeds!”
For those in the church getting yanked into the “Deeds not creeds!” riptide that may or may not have resulted from President Trump’s silence at the Bush funeral, I’ll simply say, “Be careful.” Videos like the one shared here are what happen when there are no definable contours to the faith you confess.
Yes, there are those who just go through the motions. I get that point. Some believe that such repetitive staleness is the constricting enemy of free-flowing religion from the heart.
How’d you learn the alphabet? Repetition. How’d you learn how to speak? Repetition and by being repeatedly immersed in language. How’d you learn how to dress yourself? Repetition. How’d you learn anything of value in your life? Well, whatever it was, I’d be willing to bet repetition played a part.
Still, I get the premise. But again I’d urge folks to be honest. Even the churches with no creeds have the people among them who just go through the motions. Every church has those people. Just keep in mind there’s a huge distinction to be made between repetition born of “traditionalism” and repetition in service to “tradition.” Traditionalism is, for the sake of a definition, the dead faith of the living. It represents a somnolent faith. It is to do for the sake of doing and nothing more. And I dare say that it’s the traditionalists, the ones who can’t see the value in tradition, who get bored by substantive things and want to go off the sure path to things unknown, they’re the ones who lead the churches into mushy religiosity. Tradition is different. It is the living faith of the dead. It is a carrying on of the past into the future. It is an unbroken gathering of the one true faith spread across the generations and throughout the world. Time means very little to tradition because it is unbound by it. Tradition stands in place to say that the truths of the faith aren’t ours to change because they don’t belong to just us. Tradition isn’t a bending reed in the winds of culture. It’s a tree with endless rings in its core. Tradition is a binding thing that maintains identity for the whole and belongs to the whole.
“Why do we put an angel on the top of the tree at Christmas time, dad?”
“Well, Susie, because that angel has been in our family for a long time. Putting it on top of the tree is a tradition. I did it. Grandpa’s family did it. His dad’s family did it, and his dad before him did it. When we do this, we’re sort of, well, showing that we’re a family and that we’re in this together.”
There’s a reason the holy Christian church throughout the ages has subscribed to the Apostles’, Nicene, and Athanasian creeds. Creeds help to set the boundaries for this and stand in stark contrast to bad theologies that are more than capable of wiping out entire populations of faith in a single generation. The creeds bear no “non-descript dudes” that leave questions. Who is the virgin? It’s Mary. What child is she bearing? The Son of God, Jesus Christ, who suffered under Pontius Pilate, was crucified, died, and was buried, and then then He rose again from the dead. For what reason did this happen? To save the world from sin, which includes me! How did Jesus’ conception happen? I know it wasn’t Joseph, so then, was it God the Father? No, Christ was incarnate by the Holy Spirit. He is true God in the flesh, born to win salvation!
Creeds help to prevent confusion in these things, making sure the message remains crystal clear.
And by the way, for the record, “Deeds not creeds” is a creed. It is a confession of what you believe, albeit a little less thought out than most.
On another front of the same discussion, for the Christians in the political sphere doing all they can to say President Trump set a positive example by refusing to speak the Creed, I’d say in tandem that you’re speaking out of both sides of your mouth, especially when you clamor for unity around a party platform. The party platform is the party’s creed. Even further, I’d encourage folks to take a quick stroll through history. It is an observable datum that the beginning of the demise of any society or subset organization and its affirmed morality begins with the destruction of its creeds. When you see the citizens dismantling or simply disregarding the statements of the convictions and the language (the precisely selected words) that communicate those convictions, you’re watching a group lose both its identity and its way forward. They’re heading into treacherous waters. As the lines become blurry, eventually they dissipate and disappear. With that, if you can’t locate the border of what you know to be objectively true and untrue, you may find yourself standing on foreign soil.
To close, you should also know that the church that made this video is the same one in which one of their members told one of mine as he and his family were observing that there weren’t any crosses in the place that the reason they don’t have any crosses is because the cross is a disgustingly off-putting image. Go figure. Paul said “We preach Christ crucified!” When that message is disgustingly off-putting, you may have a problem with the internal, free-flowing religion emerging from your heart. My recommendation: Try one of the three ecumenical creeds. It’ll help.
Just a thought for you to stir into your eggnog and sip.